Since I am Con, and I do not need to prove the inverse of the resolution to win, I await elaboration. In short summary, Pro has yet to provided enough positive impact to affirm the resolution. See cards from the most recent sets and discover what players. Browse through cards from Magic's entire history.
Evidently, these are not the same, hence they do not closely resemble. Search for the perfect addition to your deck. Black - Swamps, Red - Mountains and Green - Forests, whilst the colour types for Force of Will has: Light, Fire, Water, Wind and Darkness. For example, the colour types for MTG has: White - Plains, Blue - Islands. Not a shred of evidence is provided for either facet.Ģ) In the case hat Pro can affirm the above, the TCGs are not wholly about abilities, meaning that there are other factors that into consideration, and in reality, are actually different. This occurred due to Pro not providing evidence that (1) there are abilities in both games, and (2) the abilities closely resemble. The reasons beings:ġ) Pro has provided a bare assertion, which is a logical fallacy. Now, since it has been established that both card games needs to "closely resemble" each other, in order for Pro to affirm the resolution, the meagre argument that they closely resemble because "the almost exact abilities flying", is insufficient to affirm the resolution. Allow me to provide a reasonable definition:Ĭlone - a person or thing that duplicates, imitates, or closely resembles another in appearance, function, performance, or style Īs you can see, the minimum requirement of Pro is that Force of Will TCG " closely resembles" Magic: The Gathering. Thank you, SQzombie, for instigating this debate.Ī key term in the resolution is "clone", of which my opponent has not provided a definition for.
0 kommentar(er)
